<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: privacy, libraries and others&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kimberlychristen.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kimberlychristen.com/?p=885</link>
	<description>Kimberly Christen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim Christen</title>
		<link>http://www.kimberlychristen.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-30786</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Christen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimberlychristen.com/?p=885#comment-30786</guid>
		<description>Michael,
Great! I look forward to reading through your blog more closely.

cheers,
kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
Great! I look forward to reading through your blog more closely.</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Zimmer</title>
		<link>http://www.kimberlychristen.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-30784</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Zimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimberlychristen.com/?p=885#comment-30784</guid>
		<description>Hi Kim,

When I read your mention of “cross-culturally”, I (incorrectly) presumed you meant different global cultures.

Reading your later comment and blog post, you’ll be happy to know I’m in complete agreement about the fact that there isn’t a singular conception of privacy within the U.S., whether among scholars or users. (Although U.S. law/regulation tends to have a singular — and flawed — conception of privacy).

I hope that if you read through my blog, you’d discover that I’m one of the loudest proponents of thinking about &lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/category/privacy/contextual-integrity/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;privacy as contextual&lt;/a&gt;: it means different things to different people in different contexts. It is not simple, not binary, not all or nothing.

I look forward to following your blog…

-michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kim,</p>
<p>When I read your mention of “cross-culturally”, I (incorrectly) presumed you meant different global cultures.</p>
<p>Reading your later comment and blog post, you’ll be happy to know I’m in complete agreement about the fact that there isn’t a singular conception of privacy within the U.S., whether among scholars or users. (Although U.S. law/regulation tends to have a singular — and flawed — conception of privacy).</p>
<p>I hope that if you read through my blog, you’d discover that I’m one of the loudest proponents of thinking about <a href="http://michaelzimmer.org/category/privacy/contextual-integrity/" rel="nofollow">privacy as contextual</a>: it means different things to different people in different contexts. It is not simple, not binary, not all or nothing.</p>
<p>I look forward to following your blog…</p>
<p>-michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
